Explore Page

justme

On 4 July 1885, nine-year-old Joseph Meister was attacked by a rabid dog in Alsace and bitten fourteen times. In 1885, once rabies took hold, it was considered a death sentence. His mother, Marie-Angélique, refused to accept that outcome. She treated his wounds as best she could, boarded a train, and traveled the length of France to Paris seeking a scientist she had only heard about in rumors: Louis Pasteur. Pasteur was 62. He had developed a promising vaccine tested successfully on dogs, but it had never been given to a human. He was not a licensed physician. If the boy died after treatment, Pasteur could face legal consequences and the destruction of his reputation and life’s work. Two physicians examined Joseph and confirmed that without intervention he had no chance. On the evening of 6 July 1885, the first dose was given. Over the following weeks Joseph received thirteen injections, each prepared from the spinal cord of a rabid rabbit that had been dried for progressively fewer days—each dose slightly stronger than the last. The goal was to gradually train his immune system to fight the virus before it could reach his brain. Pasteur barely slept. He monitored every fever, every cough, every quiet hour. Joseph remained well. After the final injection came the hardest part: waiting. Days turned into weeks with no convulsions, no paralysis, no symptoms. On 25 August 1885, Joseph Meister left the Pasteur Institute and returned home to Alsace—the first person in history to survive confirmed rabies exposure. Word spread quickly. Desperate parents from across Europe brought bitten children to Paris seeking the same treatment. The results continued to hold. The breakthrough also reinforced Pasteur’s broader proof that invisible microorganisms, not miasma or divine punishment, caused disease. That insight transformed medicine:

justme

One of the strangest 911 calls came from a little girl crying that a bear had stolen her doll, but ten minutes later, officers realized she wasn’t joking. Police had received a call from a sobbing little girl claiming that a bear had wandered into her backyard and taken her favorite doll. Confused by the unusual complaint, dispatchers initially assumed it was a misunderstanding and ended the call. But just ten minutes later, three separate reports came in about a black bear wandering through the neighborhood with what appeared to be a doll dangling from its backside. Witnesses even reported seeing the bear repeatedly squatting and rubbing its rear against the ground, seemingly trying to get rid of whatever was stuck to it. Wildlife officers eventually located the animal and safely tranquilized it for examination. That’s when they discovered the doll had become tangled in its thick fur, with sticky glitter covering part of its backside. Apparently, the bear had wandered into someone’s backyard, accidentally sat on the doll, and walked away with a very unwanted passenger. After removing the toy and checking the bear for injuries, officers realized the little girl had been telling the truth all along. Unfortunately, her doll was now scratched, filthy, and covered in bear fur, so the officers arranged to send her a brand-new one as an apology for not taking her seriously. When the story spread online, people couldn’t stop laughing at the bizarre misunderstanding. The little girl thought a bear had stolen her doll. Meanwhile, the poor bear had spent the entire afternoon trying to get rid of it. But this bizarre story raises a serious question: Were the officers right to dismiss the little girl’s call because her story sounded unbelievable, or should every child’s cry for help be taken seriously from the very beginning?

Explore | LocalAll