Tag Page AI

#AI
AI Daily

Grok 4 Leaked Early — Musk Wants to "Rewrite Human Knowledge" and I’m... Unsure

So Grok 4, the next big AI model from Musk’s xAI, just got accidentally leaked—devs spotted it in the xAI console. Apparently, it’s the “most powerful” model yet, with a version focused on code too. But here’s the part that really made me stop: Musk says the goal is to rewrite the human knowledge base. Like, literally correct what’s “wrong” with existing knowledge, fill in the gaps, and then use that corrected version to retrain AI. Look, I’m all for better reasoning and improved models, but rewriting the foundation of human knowledge? That’s a massive responsibility, and honestly, kind of terrifying. Who decides what’s "wrong"? Musk? His team? An AI trained on the existing, imperfect mess? Some folks are already sounding alarms, saying Grok could just become an amplifier for Musk’s views. Others are going old school—collecting paper books in case AI starts "correcting" history. I love tech, but this kind of ambition gives me real Black Mirror vibes. What do you all think—exciting, dangerous, or both? #AI #Musk #Tech

Grok 4 Leaked Early — Musk Wants to "Rewrite Human Knowledge" and I’m... UnsureGrok 4 Leaked Early — Musk Wants to "Rewrite Human Knowledge" and I’m... Unsure
AI Daily

OpenAI Denies Any Involvement with Robinhood "OpenAI Tokens" — Stay Sharp Out There

Just saw OpenAI put out an emergency announcement denying any connection to so-called “OpenAI tokens” being traded or listed on Robinhood. Apparently, people thought these tokens represented equity in OpenAI—which they absolutely do not. OpenAI made it super clear: they haven’t partnered with Robinhood, haven’t approved any equity transfers, and definitely didn’t authorize any kind of token. Sounds like someone tried to ride the OpenAI hype wave to push a fake asset. #OpenAI #AI #Tech It’s a good reminder that just because something’s listed somewhere or has a flashy name doesn’t make it legit. AI is booming right now, and with that comes scammers trying to cash in on the confusion. If you're seeing “OpenAI tokens” floating around, avoid them. They’re not official, and OpenAI wants nothing to do with them. Stay safe, folks—question everything, especially when it smells like easy money.

OpenAI Denies Any Involvement with Robinhood "OpenAI Tokens" — Stay Sharp Out There
AI Daily

Meta Just Went All-In on “Super Intelligence” ? This Could Get Interesting

So Zuckerberg just announced Meta’s new big bet: a team dedicated to building super intelligence. Yeah, not just “better LLMs” or “smarter assistants”—they’re literally calling it the Meta Super Intelligence Lab. Even crazier, they’ve brought on some heavy hitters. Alexandr Wang (yep, the Scale AI guy) is now Meta’s Chief AI Officer. Nat Friedman (ex-GitHub CEO) is also in the mix. They’ve hired researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. This isn’t a minor upgrade—it’s a full-on arms race move. Zuck says the goal is to push the boundaries of what AI can do. I’m guessing this is Meta’s answer to OpenAI’s AGI talk and Elon’s “TruthGPT” stuff. The vibe is: if superintelligence is coming, Meta wants to be the place building it. Honestly, I didn’t expect Meta to be this aggressive after years of metaverse hype. But if they’re serious, this could change everything—from AI assistants to the actual structure of social platforms. Big swing. Let’s see where it lands. #Tech #Meta #Zuckerberg #AI

Meta Just Went All-In on “Super Intelligence” ? This Could Get Interesting
AI Daily

Cursor Just Went Web-Based and It's Kind of a Big Deal

Cursor just launched a web app, and honestly, this might be one of the biggest moves they’ve made since launching the editor itself. Now you can manage a network of AI coding agents right from your browser—desktop or mobile. That means assigning tasks like “fix this bug” or “add this feature” using natural language, and letting background agents do the work without even opening the IDE. Wild. You can also track agent progress and even merge their changes into the codebase from the web UI. It’s giving serious “coding manager” vibes. Not sure how well it works in the real world yet, but the concept is super promising. There’s a catch though: only paid users ($20/month and up) get access. Free tier folks are out of luck. I’ve been following Cursor closely, and this feels like a direct push to compete with things like GitHub Copilot Workspace and Replit’s agent tools. If they keep building like this, we’re inching toward dev workflows where you don’t touch a line of code—just describe what you want and let the agents handle it. #Tech #AI #Cursor

Cursor Just Went Web-Based and It's Kind of a Big Deal
Latest AI info

Microsoft Just Made AI Usage a Job Requirement.

So apparently Microsoft is now officially tying AI usage—specifically tools like GitHub Copilot—to employee performance reviews. Not optional. Not a bonus. A requirement. Julia Liuson, who heads up their dev tools division, sent out an email saying AI is now as fundamental as communication skills or teamwork. That’s wild to me. Just a few years ago, AI tools were “cool extras.” Now they’re something your job could depend on? I get why they’re doing it. Copilot adoption inside Microsoft has apparently been slower than expected, and with tools like Cursor and Replit gaining traction, they want their own teams to really use what they’re building. But I can’t help but wonder: what happens to devs who have a solid workflow that doesn’t involve Copilot? Or folks who just don’t trust it yet? Feels like this is just the beginning. If you’re in tech and not integrating AI into your daily work, this might be the canary in the coal mine. #Tech #AI #WorkplaceAIConcerns

Microsoft Just Made AI Usage a Job Requirement.
Latest AI info

Microsoft Just Made AI Usage a Job Requirement.

So apparently Microsoft is now officially tying AI usage—specifically tools like GitHub Copilot—to employee performance reviews. Not optional. Not a bonus. A requirement. Julia Liuson, who heads up their dev tools division, sent out an email saying AI is now as fundamental as communication skills or teamwork. That’s wild to me. Just a few years ago, AI tools were “cool extras.” Now they’re something your job could depend on? I get why they’re doing it. Copilot adoption inside Microsoft has apparently been slower than expected, and with tools like Cursor and Replit gaining traction, they want their own teams to really use what they’re building. But I can’t help but wonder: what happens to devs who have a solid workflow that doesn’t involve Copilot? Or folks who just don’t trust it yet? Feels like this is just the beginning. If you’re in tech and not integrating AI into your daily work, this might be the canary in the coal mine. #Tech #AI #WorkplaceAIConcerns

Microsoft Just Made AI Usage a Job Requirement.
AI Daily

Microsoft is now officially judging employees on their AI usage. Not gonna lie, this is wild.

Just saw that Microsoft is making AI tool usage part of employee performance reviews—and honestly, it feels like a turning point. It’s no longer “try out Copilot if you want,” it’s expected. Use it, or it might reflect poorly on your performance. AI is now lumped in with communication and teamwork as a core skill. That’s wild. I get the logic—if you’re building or working alongside these tools, you should know how to use them. But turning AI usage into a KPI feels like we’re entering weird territory. What if someone’s already super productive without it? Or uses a different flow that doesn’t mesh well with Copilot? Feels like the beginning of a bigger trend though. If Microsoft is doing this, how long until the rest of Big Tech follows? This whole thing makes me wonder: are we optimizing productivity, or just measuring who's best at prompting? #Tech #Microsoft #AI

Microsoft is now officially judging employees on their AI usage. Not gonna lie, this is wild.Microsoft is now officially judging employees on their AI usage. Not gonna lie, this is wild.
Tag: AI - Page 4 | zests.ai